GB Writes

Some Brief Islāmic-History (`Aqā’id/Theologies during the Era of al-Khilāfah Islāmic-Governance)

al-Muqaddimah/Prelude

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exposing the “Wahhābism” Mythos/Fallacy

Ash`arism in a Nutshell

Ash`arīs view that the Fitrah/Nature-Of-Allah is never to be compared to Creation, hence they conclude the “Necessity” to not view the Sifāt/Characteristics-Of-Allah as being Literal, Real, Actual, etc. Also, they’re also deeply rooted in Rationalism, Rhetoric, etc. (Furthermore) Ash`arīs are particularly notoriously known for imposing Unjust-Takfīr/Blasphemy against Fellow-Muslims whom’re Non-Ash`arīs, in spite of the Progenitor/Founder of Ash`arism making Deathbed-Repentance against Unjust-Takfīr against Muslim Non-Ash`arīs. Ash`arīs (Religio-Sectarian Adherents) to al-Ash`ariyyah (Ash`arism) have a sorrid/notorious Religio-Reputation/History of imposing Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims exclusively because they’re Non-Ash`arīs.

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exposing Ash`arī-Desperados

The Takfīrī-Kalām/Rhetoric found amongst Ash`arīs, via within Ash`arism, etc. is proven via 1 Specific-Ash`arī whom I personally love to hate:

Amīn Muhammad (The Ash`arī-Prostitute)

Game-Of-Thobes: Theological and Juridicial Lies by Ash`arī-Cultist Amīn Muhammad (The Theological-Prostitute)

Why use Amīn Muhammad as a Mathl/Example?!!!

#GoodQuestion…#Answer

Amin Muhammad and those like them have accused Fellow-Muslims who’re Non-Ash`arīs of:

Being Disbelievers just because they’re Non-Ash`arīs.

Being “Atheists”…more specifically of having “NOI-Beliefs” (NOIers of course themselves are Atheists ironically).

Being Non-Muslims, because they took their Shahādāt (Islāmic-Faith Testimonies) @ so-called “Salafī-Masājid/Mosques”.

etc.

Scattered-Maturity

Allah states:

“ليس كمثله شيئ و هو السميع البصير”

“There’s none like Them and They’re The All-Hearing, The All-Seeing.”

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.42, V.11)

This is a Popular-Citation used by Ash`arīs, to pontificate/promote their Theological-Claims that the Sifāt/Features of Allah are “Non-Literal”. Instead, Ash`arīs claim that the Sifāt of Allah are “Allegorical”. I, particularly, take Great-Issue with Ash`arīs claiming that the Sifāt/Features of Allah are “Unreal”.

Like:

The Face of Allah

The Eyes of Allah

Voice/Speech of Allah

The Hands/Fingers of Allah

The Shins of Allah

The Feet of Allah

etc.

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exposing the ridiculous Pseudo-Monopoly over the Sifāt/Features of Allah

an-Nuzūl/Revelatory-Texts proving that the Sifāt of Allah are in fact Literal

al-Istiwā/Posturing

“الرّحمن على العرش أستوى”

“The Source-Of-Mercy is postured above the Throne.”

The Kayfiyyah (Howness) of al-Istiwā is Majhūl (Unknown). The Eternal/Divine-Action of al-Istiwā is Mutawātir (Public-Info.). However, according to Ash`arīs: this is a Non-Literal Sifah/Feature of Allah. The Ash`arī-Ta’wīl/Conclusion is that “Modality” (a Sifah of al-Makhlūq [Creation]) is what Muslim Non-Ash`arīs attempt to apply to Allah.

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.20, V.5)

at-Taklīm/Conversing

“و كلّم الله موسى تكليماً”

“And Allah spoke Wording to Moses.”

The Āyah/Verse from al-Qur’ān (Recitable-Scripture) clearly details that Allah and Moses had Real-Life Convos with each other. However, according to Ash`arīs: this is a Non-Literal Sifah/Feature of Allah. The Ash`arī-Ta’wīl/Conclusion is that al-Kalām (Speech) is a Sifah of al-Makhlūq that Muslim Non-Ash`arīs attempt to apply to Allah.

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.4, V.164)

When a Muslim Non-Ash`arī states anything about the Sifāt of Allah: no Theological-Muslim is trying to claim the Allah and al-Makhlūq are “similar”. But, pitifully, this is precisely what Ash`arīs accuse Non-Ash`arīs of. And, this is done via the Tahrīf/Distortion of Religio-Terms describing Non-Muslims whom ascribes Fallacies to the Fitrah/Nature of Allah.

Ironically, affirming the Reality/Literalism of the Sifāt of Allah is classified as al-Athariyyah (Atharism). Atharism has always been the Theological-Default of the Average/Regular-Muslim historically.

The Religio-Terms Ash`arīs distort in order to falsely accuse Non-Ash`arīs of al-Kufr (Blasphemy, Disbelief, etc.)

These Religio-Academic Terms are used by Ash`arīs, as Pseudo-Justifications, to impose at-Takfīr against any Fellow-Muslim whom either doesn’t or refuses to accept the Religio-Theological Ta’wīl (Interpretation) of al-`Aqīdah (Islāmic-Theology) according to Ash`arism.

ash-Shirk

Linguistic: Association

Islamic: To worship other than Allah, or to ascribe something false to Allah.

ath-Thabūtiyyah

Linguistic: Affirmation/Establishment

Islamic: Whatever Allah affirms for Themselves via at-Tanzīl/Revelation.

as-Salbiyyah

Linguistic: Negation

Islāmic: Whatever Allah negates/prohibits for Themselves via at-Tanzīl.

at-Tahrīf

Linguistic: Distortion/Adulteration

Islāmic: The Corruption of at-Tanzīl and/or its Meanings.

at-Takyīf

Linguistic: How/Howness

Islamic: Questioning what Allah affirms/confirms for Themselves, either via The Qur’ān, or via the Sunnah/Prophetic-Tradition.

at-Tamthīl/at-Tashbīh/at-Tajsīm

Linguistic: Likeness, Assimilation, Anthropomorphism, Theophany, etc.

Islamic: Attempting to claim that Allah is “similar” to Creation and/or attempting to “equate” Creation to Allah.

at-Ta`tīl

Linguistic: Rejection

Islāmic: To reject whatever Allah affirms/confirms for Themselves, and/or whatever Allah reveals via The Qur’ān & the Sunnah.

at-Tanzīh

Linguistic: Flawlessness/Perfection

Islāmic: Rejection of any&all Imperfections/Flaws, which’re attempted to be attributed to Allah from Creation.

Tafwīdhmatic vs. Reasonable-Ta’wīl

The Hypocritical-Irony about Ash`arism

The Theological/Sectarian Sucka-Shit which Ash`arīs do against Fellow-Muslims whom’re Non-Ash`arīs: this is precisely how/why `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl (Abul-Hasan al-Ash`arī), the Progenitor/Founder of Ash`arism, literally made at-Tawbah (Repentance) for imposing Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslim on their Deathbed.

So…wait: who was `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl?!!!

#GoodQuestion…#Answer

`Alī ibn-Ismā`īl was a Prominent Religio-Scholar during the 3rd-Century, AH (10th-Century, CE). Originally, `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl was a Disciple of Mu`tazilism: founded by Wāsil ibn-`Atā’ in the 1st-Century, AH (Century, CE). Mu`tazilīs highly focus on Rationalism&Rhetoric (based primarily upon Greco-Roman Philosophy). Also, they claim that Allah is similar to Creation. As well, they’re notoriously known for misinterpreting al-Mashī’ah/Freewill. In addition, they also claim that The Qur’an was “created”.

At some Point, during their 40’s, `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl began to break away from Mu`tazilism: openly critiquing and critizing Mu`tazilī-Views. They then set the Usūl (Origins, Foundations, etc.) of what would later be known as Ash`arism.

Why was the Deathbed-Statement of `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl so important?!!!

#GoodQuestion…#Answer

It’s because `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl knew they were Dead-Ass-Wrong, for formerly imposing Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims (simply because Non-Ash`arīs didn’t Dick-Ride their Religio-Theological Views). In fact, ironically, the Entire-Point of `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl making at-Tawbah was to attempt to reverse a Takfīr-Culture Trend which began with Ash`arism. `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl knew they done Fucked-Up and they didn’t want to return to Allah with such a Fuck-Up on their Hisāb (Record). The Mas’alah/Subject of at-Takfīr is so important, that at-Tanzīl directly inferences as well as addresses it.

This is precisely how/why Allah states:

“And never let your Hatred, against any People, prevent you from behaving justly.”

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.5, V.8)

Theological-Consequences of Unjust-Takfīr

Muhammad (Peace be upon him) stated the following, regarding at-Takfīr/Blasphemy:

“No Person accuses another of either being a Fāsiq/Sinner or a Kāfir (Disbeliever/Non-Muslim), except that they’re one themselves, if the Other isn’t which they’ve pontificated/claimed.”

(al-Bukhārī)

“Whomever attributes/ascribes Kufr (Disbelief) to their Brother is just like their Killer/Murderer.”

(al-Bukhārī, at-Tirmidhī)

“If a Muslim calls someone a Kāfir: if they are then let it be, otherwise they themselves are a Kāfir.”

(Abū-Dāwud)

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exploring the Deathbed-Statement of Abil-Hasan al-Ash`arī

These Sectarian-Bozos are the Opps

Game-Of-Thobes: Gareth Bryant’s History & Refutation of the Madkhalīs and the Ahbāshīs

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing and exploring the Romance of the 3-`Aqīdahs

And, this is precisely how/why Muslims like Gareth Bryant are essential, to constantly consistently put these Fake-Shaykhs as well as these Sectarian-Bozos on Front-St. And, once again…these so-called Religio-Discussions Debates are literally Religio-Sectarian Smokescreens: Euphemisms for Over-Compensations for the Fact that these so-called “Students/Persons of Knowledge” have proven to be 💯%-Useless for Muslim Afro/Latino-American Communities. Ash`arīs, ironically, are just as Morally-Bankrupt as the Non-Ash`arīs they criticize. Ash`arīs pontificate/claim that they’re some Sort of “Alternative”. But, rather, in fact: Ash`arīs are a Pack of Sectarian-Lowlives (just like the Lowlives they claim to combat).

Game-Of-Thobes: Sectarians are Theological-Minstrels

How does one combat Miseducated-Ash`arīs?!!!

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exposing the Miseducation of Ash`arīs

It’s the Same-Way one’s to deal with any Sifah/Manifestation of al-Hizbiyyah: attack them wherever you find them. Attack these Hoe-Ass-Sectarians via In-Person, Online, Speeches, Durūs (Lectures/Classes), Khutub (Sermons), Posts, Rasā’il, etc. Give Sectarians 0 Breathing-Space…be an Annoyance, a Pest, etc. Harass these Hoe-Ass-Hizbīs any/every Change one gets. I’m saying this, authoritatively, because this is what da Fuck I do. All-Day/Everyday…I’ve made it my Life’s-Mission to attack Hoe-Ass-Hizbīs/Sectarians. And, I will continue to attack these Hoe-Ass-Niggas so long as Allah grants me Life.

Gareth Bryant