GB Writes

I write therefore I am/I am what I write


Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exposing the Truth behind Ash`arīs denying that Allah spoke with Moses

al-Muqaddimah/Prelude

“و كلّم الله موسى تكليماً”

“And Allah spoke Wording to Moses.”

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.4, V.164)

According to Ash`arī-Rhetoric

Allah states:

“ليس كمثله شيئ و هو السميع البصير”

“There’s none like Them and They’re The All-Hearing, The All-Seeing.”

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.42, V.11)

This is a Popular-Citation used by Ash`arīs, to pontificate/promote their Theological-Claims that the Sifāt/Features of Allah are “Non-Literal”. Instead, Ash`arīs claim that the Sifāt of Allah are “Allegorical”. I, particularly, take Great-Issue with Ash`arīs claiming that the Sifāt/Features of Allah are “Unreal”.

Like:

The Face of Allah

The Eyes of Allah

Voice/Speech of Allah

The Hands/Fingers of Allah

The Shins of Allah

The Feet of Allah

etc.

Contrary to Ash`arī-Rhetoric

Allah has a Real/Literal-Voice.

The Sawt/Voice of Allah: 💯%-Reality

Allah speaks Real/Literal-Words.

The Kalām/Speech of Allah: 💯%-Reality

All-Nuzūl/Revelations are,
by default/definition,
the Kalām/Speech-Of-Allah.

Allah literally describes Themselves
having Taklīm/Convos with, speaking to, etc.:

al-Malā’ikah/Angels

ash-Shaytān/Satan

al-Insān/Humans

al-Anbiyā’/Prophetic-Individuals

etc.

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.2, V.30-36; Chpt.7, V.11-18&142-144; Chpt.15, V.26-44; Chpt.20, V.9-48; Chpt.28, V.29-35; Chpt.38, V.71-85)

By Virtue of such a Fact:

To deny the Voice/Words of Allah,
it’s the same as denying the
Revelations of Allah.

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exposing the ridiculous Pseudo-Monopoly over the Sifāt/Features of Allah

The Proof that Allah uses Human-Language to communicate with Humanity

No one claims that Allah “possesses” any Type/Kind of “Specific-Lughah/Language”. Yet, at the Same-Time all of the Nuzūl/Revelations Allah ever sent to either al-Jinn/Fire-Beings or al-Insān/Humanity have been conveyed via Lughāt/Languages. This is Mutawātir/Public-Fact.

Allah created Language for the Human-Race. Allah had literally (divinely/personally) taught Adam (the 1st-Human) Human-Language.

Humanity evolved/revolutionized
their Human-Languages…
…Allah created Human-Language.

(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.2, V.30-36; Chpt.96, V.1-5)

This is literally no different than/from any other Sifah which Allah has, which They’ve also created for Their Creation.

Tafwīdhmatic vs. Reasonable-Ta’wīl

The Important-Difference between the Sifāt (Features) of Allah and the Sifāt of al-Makhlūq (Creatures/Beings)

All-Sifāt of Allah are Samad/Eternal:

Uncreated

Unlimited

Unrestricted

Uncontrolled

All-Sifāt of al-Makhlūq are either:

Created

Finite

Infinite

Limited

Restricted

Controlled

and/or all of the Above

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exposing Unjust-Takfīr via Ash`arī-Style Takfīr-Culture

Here’s Several-Amthāl/Example of Allah granting Their Creation Sifāt which Allah also has

The Power-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Power.

The Mercy-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Mercy.

The Love-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Love.

The Knowledge-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Knowledge.

The Hatred-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Hatred.

The Patience-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Patience.

The Hearing-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Hearing.

The Sight-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Sight.

The Wisdom-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Wisdom.

The Speech-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Speech

The Creativity-Of-Allah: Eternal

Allah created Human-Creativity

Tafwīdhmatic vs. Reasonable-Ta’wīl

The Hypocritical-Irony of Ash`arism

This is literally how Ash`arīs Self-Takfīr their own Selves:

Claiming that Allah doesn’t speak…
…that literally opposes all of the
Āyāt/Verses of al-Qur’ān when
Allah states they spoke to
Specific-Akwān/Beings.

Ash`arīs blindly attempt to Ta`wīl every damn Thing, even when something is blatantly obvious. And not only is that hugely unintelligent, but more so it’s theologically dangerous. And, it actually makes Ash`arīs just as heretical as any Non-Ash`arīs they criticize:

Atharīs

Salafīs

So-Called “Wahhābīs”

etc.

Game-Of-Thobes: Gareth Bryant’s History & Refutation of the Madkhalīs and the Ahbāshīs

And this is precisely how/why `Alī ibn-Ismā`īl (Abul-Hasan al-Ash`arī: the Progenitor/Founder of Ash`arism) had made at-Tawbah (Repentance) for accusing Fellow-Muslims of committing al-Kufr (Disbelief).

Ash`arism in a Nutshell

Ash`arīs view that the Fitrah/Nature-Of-Allah is never to be compared to Creation, hence they conclude the “Necessity” to not view the Sifāt/Characteristics-Of-Allah as being Literal, Real, Actual, etc. Also, they’re also deeply rooted in Rationalism, Rhetoric, etc. (Furthermore) Ash`arīs are particularly notoriously known for imposing Unjust-Takfīr/Blasphemy against Fellow-Muslims whom’re Non-Ash`arīs, in spite of the Progenitor/Founder of Ash`arism making Deathbed-Repentance against Unjust-Takfīr against Muslim Non-Ash`arīs. Ash`arīs (Religio-Sectarian Adherents) to al-Ash`ariyyah (Ash`arism) have a sorrid/notorious Religio-Reputation/History of imposing Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims exclusively because they’re Non-Ash`arīs.

`Alī ibn-Ismā`īl wanted to reverse the Theological Sucka-Shit they had set the Tone for. They wanted to put an End to Takfīr-Based`Aqīdah/Theology, via the Unjust-Takfīr and Takfīr-Culture Trend they had once initiated, pontificated, promoted, etc.

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exploring the Deathbed-Statement of Abil-Hasan al-Ash`arī

What’s meant by “Takfīr-Based `Aqīdah/Theology”?!!!

#GoodQuestion…#Answer

Ash`arīs (Religio-Sectarian Adherents) to al-Ash`ariyyah (Ash`arism) have a sorrid/notorious Religio-Reputation/History of imposing Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims exclusively because they’re Non-Ash`arīs. The Takfīrī-Kalām/Rhetoric found amongst Ash`arīs, via within Ash`arism, etc. is proven via 1 Specific-Ash`arī whom I personally love to hate:

Amīn Muhammad (The Ash`arī-Prostitute)

Game-Of-Thobes: Theological and Juridicial Lies by Ash`arī-Cultist Amīn Muhammad (The Theological-Prostitute)

Why use Amīn Muhammad as a Mathl/Example?!!!

#GoodQuestion…#Answer

Amin Muhammad and those like them have accused Fellow-Muslims who’re Non-Ash`arīs of:

Being Disbelievers just because they’re Non-Ash`arīs.

Being “Atheists”…more specifically of having “NOI-Beliefs” (NOIers of course themselves are Atheists ironically).

Being Non-Muslims, because they took their Shahādāt (Islāmic-Faith Testimonies) @ so-called “Salafī-Masājid/Mosques”.

etc.

Other-Ash`arīs like Amīn Muhammad have stated almost Identical-Accusations against Fellow-Muslims that’re Non-Ash`arīs.

Game-Of-Thobes: Analyzing as well as exposing the Pseudo-Justifications for Takfīr-Culture

But…What’s “Takfīr” and who’s a “Takfīrī” anyway?!!!

#GoodQuestion…#Answer

at-Takfīr

The Religio-Accusation that a Person is no longer a Muslim, via what’s known as committing ar-Riddah (Apostasy).

Takfīrī

Any Muslim whom imposes the Accusation of at-Takfīr against any Fellow-Muslim.

This is exclusively done, to attempt excluding and excommunicating Religio-Sectarian Opposition from laying claim to the Concept “Ahl-us-Sunnah (Persons of the Tradition)”.

There’s Specific Religio-Terms Ash`arīs distort in order to Takfīr Fellow-Muslims who’re Non-Ash`arīs

For the Purposes of This-Article: I’ll exclusively be focusing on the Asbāb which Ash`arīs use to impose at-Takfīr against Muslim Non-Ash`arīs. Ash`arīs historically have always used, manipulated, distorted, etc. Various Islāmic-Concepts as Religio-Theological Weapons against Non-Ash`arīs. These Religio-Academic Terms are used by Ash`arīs, as Pseudo-Justifications, to impose at-Takfīr against any Fellow-Muslim whom either doesn’t or refuses to accept the Religio-Theological Ta’wīl (Interpretation) of al-`Aqīdah (Islāmic-Theology) according to Ash`arism.

ash-Shirk

Linguistic: Association

Islamic: To worship other than Allah, or to ascribe something false to Allah.

ath-Thabūtiyyah

Linguistic: Affirmation/Establishment

Islamic: Whatever Allah affirms for Themselves via at-Tanzīl/Revelation.

as-Salbiyyah

Linguistic: Negation

Islāmic: Whatever Allah negates/prohibits for Themselves via at-Tanzīl.

at-Tahrīf

Linguistic: Distortion/Adulteration

Islāmic: The Corruption of at-Tanzīl and/or its Meanings.

at-Takyīf

Linguistic: How/Howness

Islamic: Questioning what Allah affirms/confirms for Themselves, either via The Qur’ān, or via the Sunnah/Prophetic-Tradition.

at-Tamthīl/at-Tashbīh/at-Tajsīm

Linguistic: Likeness, Assimilation, Anthropomorphism, Theophany, etc.

Islamic: Attempting to claim that Allah is “similar” to Creation and/or attempting to “equate” Creation to Allah.

at-Ta`tīl

Linguistic: Rejection

Islāmic: To reject whatever Allah affirms/confirms for Themselves, and/or whatever Allah reveals via The Qur’ān & the Sunnah.

at-Tanzīh

Linguistic: Flawlessness/Perfection

Islāmic: Rejection of any&all Imperfections/Flaws, which’re attempted to be attributed to Allah from Creation.

The Aforementioned-Terms are what Ash`arism teaches to accuse any Muslim who’s Non-Ash`arī of committing, thereby having Pseudo-Justifications for imposing Unjust-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims whom don’t ascribe to Ash`arism.

Are we the “Persons-Of-Qiblah” or are we the “Persons-Of-Sunnah”?!!!

What’re the Asbāb/Reasons behind imposing at-Takfīr against Fellow-Muslims?!!!

#GoodQuestion…#Answer

at-Takfīr is always a Muqaddimah/Prelude to Muslim-On-Muslim Qattāl/Violence. There’s a Host of Amthāl/Examples, regarding this.

1. The Children-Of-Israel murdering al-Anbiyā/Prophets (Peace be upon them altogether) sent to them.

2. The Assassination of `Uthmān ibn-`Affān (May Allah be pleased with them).

3. The Civil-War between `Alī ibn-`Imrān & Mu`āwiyah ibn-Sakhr (May Allah be pleased with them both).

4. The Warring Muslim-States via: Sicily, Iberia/Andalusia, Saharan-Africa, the Middle-East, the Indian-Subcontinent, etc.

5. The Takhrīj/Khurūj (Rebellion) of Muslim-Arabs against al-Khilāfah/Islāmic-Governance (via the Ottoman-Empire) during World-War I.

6. The Invasion/Massacres of Pakistan against Bangladesh.

7. The Civil-Wars via Somalia, Sudan, etc.

8. The Iraq-Iran War.

(at-Tabarī, as-Suyūtī, ibn-Kathīr, Encyclopedia Britannica, World History Encyclopedia)

All of the Aforementioned-Scenarios occurred, exclusively, because there were Muslims whom refused to: recognize, respect, accept, etc. the Religio-Spiritual Sanctity of Fellow-Muslims. And, Takfīr-Culture was Top-Priority for all of the Scenarios listed. It’s a Known-Fact: if a Muslim doesn’t view a Fellow-Muslim as their Religio-Spiritual Equal, then it’s easy to be a Zhālim/Tyrant against them.

The People of as-Sunnah (Prophetic-Tradition) don’t slander Other-People

How can one combat Sectarian Gang-Culture?!!!

#GoodQuestion…#Answer

Attack them wherever you find them. Attack them via In-Person, Online, Speeches, Lectures, Classes, Khutbahs/Sermons, Posts, Rasā’il/Articles, etc. Give Sectarians 0 Breathing-Space…be an Annoyance, a Pest, etc. Harass these Hoe-Ass-Hizbīs any/every Change one gets. I’m saying this, authoritatively, because this is what da Fuck I do. All-Day/Everyday…I’ve made it my Life’s-Mission to attack Hoe-Ass-Hizbīs/Sectarians. And, I will continue to attack these Hoe-Ass-Niggas so long as Allah grants me Life.

Gareth Bryant



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *