What’s a “Theological-Minstrel”?!!!
#GoodQuestion…#Answer
Definition of “Minstrel”
Who qualifies as being a “Theological-Minstrel”?!!!
#GoodQuestion…#Answer
1. The Atharī-Jiggaboos
Led by the Atharī Frat-House
Gareth Bryant’s Atharī Proposal to the Atharī Frat-House
2. The Ash`arī-Coons
Led by the Ash`arī Social-Club
Hujjah/Refutation against the “3453” Ash`arī-Cult led by Amīn Muhammad
3. The Salafī-Sambos
Led by the Salafī-Mafia
The Hujjah/Indictment against the Salafī-Mafia
Sectarian-Destruction within Muslim-Communities
Any/all other Muslim Afro-Americans, regardless of whether they’re Sectarian or Non-Sectarian: they allow themselves to behave just like 1 of the 3 Aforementioned.
How do we define these Types/Kinds of Muslim-Niggas?!!!
#GoodQuestion…#Answer
We define These Hoe-Ass-Niggas, as per the Islāmic-Concepts which they each pathetically attempt to be the Religio-Gatekeepers of.
Concepts/Terms which Muslims attempt to monopolize for their own Sectarian-Agendas
at-Tafwīdh
Meaning: Neutrality
Context: This is very specific to an Aspect of al-`Aqīdah/Islāmic-Theology, regarding the Sifāt/Features of Allah. The Maslahah/Purpose of at-Tafwīdh is to simply recognize/accept what is detailed about Allah, via at-Tanzīl/Revelation, without al-Kayfiyyah/at-Takyīf (Speculation). But, there’s Certain-Muslims whom attempt to posture that they alone are the “Gatekeepers” of at-Tafwīdh.
Those whom attempt to monopolize the Term:
Atharī-Jiggaboos
Gareth Bryant’s Hujjah/Refutation against the Atharī-Liars
at-Ta’wīl
Meaning: Commentary/Interpretation
Context: This is very specific to an Aspect of al-`Aqīdah/Islāmic-Theology, regarding the Sifāt/Features of Allah. The Maslahah/Purpose of at-Ta’wīl is to only comment on, interpret about Allah that which is Islāmically-Authorized to do. But, there’s Certain-Muslims whom attempt to posture that they alone are the “Gatekeepers” of at-Ta’wīl.
Those whom attempt to monopolize the Term:
Ash`arī-Coons
The Ash`arīs are Insainly Sore-Losers
an-Najiyyah
Meaning: Salvation
Context: This exclusively pertains to the Islāmic-Concept “al-Firqat-un-Nājiyah/Saved-Group” being saved from Jahannam/Hell. This pertains to the 73-Groups of Muslims being in Jahannam, along with the 71-Groups of Jews & 72-Groups of Christians, resulting from adh-Dhalālah/Misguidance.
Those whom attempt to monopolize the Term:
Salafī-Sambos
Sectarian-Victimhood
Now…what makes Theological-Minstrels so dangerous for Muslim-Communities?!!!
#GoodQuestion…#Answer
There’s a lot of Things…I’ll mention a Particular-Thing:
Atharī-Jiggaboos, Ash`arī-Coons, Salafī-Sambos, all typically use “Shaykh-Cultutre” to pool Pussy via the same/general Muslim-Demographics:
Low-Income “Black&Brown”/Afro/Latino-Communities.
Women whom’re addicted to “Shaykh-Culture”.
Persons with Low-IQ, Mediocre Religio/Secular-Education, can’t Read worth a Damn, etc.
Muslim&Non-Muslim Women whom harbor Low Self-Esteem about themselves.
Women generally whom have Negative/Toxic-Relationships with their Biological-Fathers.
Afterall, it’s Mutawātir/Common-Knowledge that “Shaykh-Culture” is the Easiest-Way for Muslim-Men to get Pussy (via Muslim-Communities).
Gareth Bryant’s Hujjah/Refutation against Zinā/THOTery-Culture: Atharī-Womanizers, Ash`arī-Pimps, Salafreaks
Unjust-Takfīr and Takfīr-Culture is what being a Theological-Minstrel leads to
Allah states:
“And never let your hatred, against any People, prevent you from behaving justly.”
(Noble-Qur’ān: Chpt.5, V.8)
Muhammad (Peace be upon them) is authentically-reported to have detailed the 4-Sifāt (Characteristics/Qualities) of a Munāfiq (Hypocrite: any Person pontificating/claiming to be a Muslim yet there exists 0-Īmān [Belief/Faith] via their Heart). Of all the Ahādīth/Narrations recorded: the 1st-Sifah/Characteristic is always listed as “One whom lies everytime they speak.”.
(al-Bukhārī&Muslim)
What’s “Takfīr” anyway?!!!
#Good-Question…#Answer
at-Takfīr is the Belief, Presumption, Assumption, Accusation, etc. that any Fellow-Muslim is a Kāfir (Disbeliever/Non-Muslim).
Stay with me…I’m going to make it make Sense. I’ll be deliberately focusing the Context upon the Mas’alah/Issue of Unjust-Takfīr/Blasphemy & Takfīr-Culture.
Muhammad was once asked:
“Can the Believer be a Coward?”
Muhammad replied: “Yes”
“Can the Believer be a Miser?”
Muhammad replied: “Yes”
“Can the Believer be a Liar?”
Muhammad replied: “No”
(Mālik)
`Aqīdah-Whores who benefit from the Evil&Destruction of Takfīr-Culture
Ironically, instead of working with Fellow-Muslims (to contribute to the Betterment/Improvement of Muslim-Communities), these Hoe-Ass-Sectarians have become Completely-Useless. They’ve literally nothing to offer except:
Mistranslated/Distorted Islāmic-Knowledge.
Religio-Theological Madhāhib/Opinions.
Religio-Scholastic Khilāf/Bickering.
Literally, none of the Aforementioned-Things help or correct the Ahwāl (Human-Conditions) Muslim Afro-Americans (not exclusively but particularly) face as a Religio-Demographic:
Xenophobia via White-Supremacy
Self-Hate via White-Supremacy&Arabism
Arabism via Cultural-Colonization
Gang/Crimnal-Culture via Self-Hate&Fatherlessness
Fake-Everything&BBL Culture via Self-Hate&Fatherlessness
Fatherlessness via THOTery-Culture
THOTery-Culture via Fatherlessness
Poverty via Fatherlessness
Criminality via Poverty
etc.
It’s 💯%-Strategic, as per how/why the Atharī-Jiggaboos, Ash`arī-Coons, Salafī-Sambos, etc. refuse to attack any of the Religio-Social Ahwāl which I’ve aforementioned:
They aim exclusively to drown-out the Noise which indicates the Religio-Social Cries4Help via their Constituents. They’re Ill-Equipped to help their own. They’re Ill-Equipped, because they never intended to be a Presence of at-Tawfīq/at-Tahsīn (Empowerment/Improvement). They never intended as such, because they don’t give a Fuck. They literally are only interested/invested in keepin and maintaining their Individualized Sectarian-Fiefdoms, as if they’re some Sort of Religio-Feudal Lords over Fellow-Muslims. And, they use the Guise of “Islāmic-Knowledge”, to keep their own Constitutents from Religio-Academic Advancement.
Atharī Corleone’s Most Wanted: These so-called “Persons-Of-Knowledge” don’t take the Time to teach their Constituents the Arabic-Language and I know the Reasons why they won’t
#UnpopularFact
All of these Theological-Minstrels have imported this Toxic-Minhāj (Mentality), to the United States, from their Religio-Sectarian Puppet-Masters via the Following-Countries:
A Necessary-Hujjah/Refutation against Tullāb-ish-Shaytān (Pupils-Of-Satan)
Instead of Blackface we now have Sandface
We’ve all heard of the Popular Muslim-Cultural Ole-Saying:
“From the Back of the Bus, to the Back of the Camel.”
However, ironically, there’s literally Lots of Truth/Honesty to this…I’ll explain: #DontWorry
Firstly…we’re going to learn what “Blackface” and what “Sandface” actually is, in order to enrich the Ta’wīl/Context of the Mas’alah/Subject.
Now…we’re going to unpack “From the Back of the Bus, to the Back of the Camel.”:
#HypocriticalIrony
The Author of the “Back of the Bus to Back of the Camel” Concept, Hamīd Muhammad, is a Victim/Casualty of Sandface themselves. They don an Arabic-Name via the Pseudo-Auspices of the “Muslim/Islāmic-Name” Mythos/Fallacy which:
Number-1:
“Muslim/Islāmic-Name” is a Bid`ah/Religio-Innovation.
Number-2:
“Muslim/Islāmic-Name” was quite literally incepted/invented via Non-Muslims durung the 18th-Century, CE.
All these so-called “Persons-Of-Knowledge” not using their Real-Names aren’t to be trusted nor taken seriously
Now, since we’ve covered “Blackface” as well as “Sandface”, here’s the Focal-Point: Muslim Afro Americans have literally allowed, tolerated, accepted, etc. being indoctrinated to think/feel that al-Islām equals Arabism and that Arabism equals al-Islām.
To be even more accurate/honest: al-Islām has never had an `Urf/Culture (not even prior to the Revelation of The Qur’ān). However, al-Islām has always respected (allowed Muslims to have their own) `Urfiyyah/Cultural-Dynamics so long as they don’t oppose at-Tanzīl/Revelation. This is particularly/especially important, because, sadly the Muslim-World has adopted Arabism…as though pontificating/claiming anything related to al-Islām derives from Arab-Culture. This is done both subconsciously & consciously. From unecessarily adopting Arab-Dress/Arabic-Names, to speaking Non-Arabic Languages with Arab-Accents, etc.: literally all of this is a Sifah/Manifestation of al-`Asabiyyah/Xenophobia via Cultural-Colonization.
One of the Greatest-Fallacies which Muslim Non-Arabs have fallen for is the “Muslim-Only” Mythos/Pseudo-Narrative…there’s no such Thing as this. We’re not “Muslim-Only”, rather we’re Muslim-1st. Being a Muslim isn’t the Only-Dimension of our Identity, it’s the Most-Important Dimension of our Identity…it’s not the Only-Thing which makes us who we are, it’s the Most-Important Thing concerning who we are. And, for the Muslim, it’s Life&Death-Important to know the Difference.
al-Islām vs. Arabism
To conclude
Don’t be a Theological-Minstrel, instead just be Muslim-1st. Stop being a Theological-Minstrel, and instead just start being Muslim-1st.
Gareth Bryant
Leave a Reply