Gareth Bryant Writes

I write therefore I am/I am what I write


Dear Islāmophobes (specifically those whom’re Judeo-Christian):

According to the Catholic-Encyclopedia: at the Time of Jesus (Peace be upon him) & even prior to his Lifetime, Females were considered marriageable via Age-12, yet Marital-Ages varied circumstantially. Marriages were preceded by the Betrothal, after which the Bride legally belonged to the Bridegroom, though she did not live with him till about 1-Year later, when the Marriage used to be celebrated.

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htm

This is agreed upon, as per Judeo-Christian/Religio-Historical Sources & practiced in Palestine even up until the early 20th-Century, C.E. According to Alma White (A Biblical-Historian) & confirmed by W.M. Thompson (The Land and the Book, W.M. Thompson), “Some Customs of ‘Biblical-Palestine’ continued through the Centuries.”-After her Trip to the Middle-East (Circa 1910, C.E.): Alma White made Commentary on the Age-Of-Marriage in Palestine, “A Female is usually married via her 12th/10th-Year, and sometimes as early as via her 10th-Year.”.

According to James Neil (Everyday Life in the Holy Land, James Neil), Women of that Time-Period (in Palestine) were even married as young as Age-9:

a. https://gbwrites.com/2013/11/17/thechildmarriageissue

b. https://www.truthortradition.com/articles/mary-a-teenage-bride-and-mother

Now, how/why do I bring this up: I’ll tell you. Oftentimes, many of the Fiercest-Islāmophobes, especially via Academia, are in fact Judeo-Christian. Yet, there’s literally what I’ve aforementioned which none of these Judeo-Christian Islāmophobes wish/want to come to Terms with. One will in fact wonder how/why do I say this: I’ll tell you.

As per Judeo-Christian Religio-Sources, as those which I’ve already cited…according to these Sources, it’s claimed/assumed that Mary (Peace be upon her):

a. Had Several-Children with a Man named “Joseph”.

b. Never had Children with anyone named “Joseph”, yet was “married” to him (completely denying that she gave Birth to Jesus-Christ without Sexual-Intercourse).

c. Gave Birth to Jesus-Christ, yet had no Other-Children thereafter.

d. That she was between 12 & 16 Years-Of-Age when this took place.

e. That “Joseph” was Significantly-Older than she was, anywhere between his Late-Teens to Late-Sixtees.

Which brings us to the Issue of Islāmophobia: according to general Islāmophobic-Rhetoric Muhammad (Peace be upon him) is accused unjustly of being a Child-Molester, as per their Marriage to `Ā’ishah (May Allah be pleased with her), after she reached al-Balāghah/Puberty.(https://gbwrites.com/2019/01/08/survivinghypocrisy)

Now, if one strictly goes by the Judeo-Christian Narrative, especially if one is a “Christian”, while believing in the “Divinity” of Jesus-Christ: the Logic of the Islāmophobic-Slander against Muhammad by definition must also apply to the Judeo-Christian Persona of the “Husband-Of-Mary”. And, by definition, thus assuming that either “Joseph” is the Bio-Father vs. Stepfather of Jesus-Christ, you’d basically also be accusing the Father/Stepfather of your “God” (as Christians do in fact worship Jesus-Christ) is a Child-Molester. I can humanly guarantee you, that Judeo-Christians have never ponder upon the Hypocritical-Irony of this.

Gareth Bryant

1442, A.H./2020, C.E.



7 responses to “Dear Islāmophobes (specifically those whom’re Judeo-Christian):”

  1. […] cause Islamophobes to reinforce all of the classic Islamophobic rhetoric against Islam.(https://gbwrites.com/2020/10/29/judeochristianislamophobia) We, as Muslims, have a horrible habit of making the Islamophobe’s jobs easier, by doing […]

  2. Bushawn McMillan-El Avatar
    Bushawn McMillan-El

    Please discuss the tradition where the Ethiopian SIster was route to ju mu’ah…

    1. Be specific…what’s your Actual-Point?!!!

  3. Giacomo Alessandro Avatar
    Giacomo Alessandro

    You are either lazy or just stupid. The first citation/link from New Advent doesn’t say ANYTHING about women being of marriage age by 12. It talks about why St Mary went to Bethlehem with St Joseph; “There are various reasons why Mary should have accompanied Joseph on this journey; she may not have wished to lose Joseph’s protection during the critical time of her pregnancy, or she may have followed a special Divine inspiration impelling her to go in order to fulfil the prophecies concerning her Divine Son, or again she may have been compelled to go by the civil law either as an heiress or to settle the personal tax payable by women over twelve years of age.” Nothing about “Females were considered marriageable via Age-12”. Again….stupid and/or lazy. And NO…the bible is CLEAR that St Joseph did not impregnate the VIRGIN Mary…even you mohammedans teach this! So you cannot compare mohammed raping a 9-year-old girl, Aisha with St Joseph…that is just incredibly moronic. You are honestly too stupid to be taken seriously.

    1. My Article thus cites the Research of: Alma White, W.M. Thompson, James Neil respectively. Via their Writings, it’s confirmed that Women during that Time-Period (ironically prior to the Revelation of The Qur’ān) were even married by Age-9. These Facts are literally detailed via this Article itself. However, you conveniently/purposefully refused to recognize/accept the Facts that even Judeo-Christian Religio-Scholars highlight, in spite of your Judeo-Christian Pontifications/Claims. Persons like you are the Reasons how/why Muhammad (Peace be upon him) stated, “Arrogance is denying Truth & disrespecting People.”.(an-Nawawī) You & Persons like you are the Reasons how/why I tell People, all the Time, “Apathy is worse than Ignorance.”.

  4. […] Dear Islāmophobes (specifically those whom’re Judeo-Christian): […]

  5. […] Dear Islāmophobes (specifically those whom’re Judeo-Christian): […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *